They wanted to hold Exxon accountable. Then they got hacked.

A decade ago, climate activists targeting ExxonMobil were hacked, and their emails leaked. This was a significant blow to their campaign, as it exposed their strategies and communications to public scrutiny. The hack had a chilling effect on climate activism, making organizations and individuals more cautious about their online presence and communications.

The recent court case shedding light on the alleged orchestrators of the hack is significant because it highlights the lengths to which powerful interests will go to discredit and disrupt climate activism. ExxonMobil has faced numerous allegations of misleading the public about climate change and its role in it. The hacking of climate activists' emails was part of a broader strategy to undermine climate action and delay regulations. The case is a reminder that climate activism is often under attack, and that those pushing for action on climate change face significant opposition from entrenched interests.

What's next to watch is how this case unfolds and whether it leads to accountability for those involved in the hack. The outcome could have implications for the security of online activism and the ability of climate groups to organize and mobilize effectively. As the climate crisis deepens, the tactics used to silence and discredit climate activists will likely continue to evolve. It's essential to stay vigilant and ensure that those pushing for climate action can do so without fear of reprisal or disruption.

Originally reported by grist.org. CleanNews adds analysis for climate & energy readers.