She governs a US territory. But she has no say in who mines its waters.

The situation in the Pacific territory highlights the complexities of jurisdiction and governance in the context of emerging industries like deep-sea mining. The fact that the local governor has no say in who mines the territory's waters raises concerns about the equity and sustainability of this industry. As the world transitions to renewable energy, the demand for critical minerals like cobalt, nickel, and lithium is expected to surge, and deep-sea mining is being touted as a potential source of these resources.

However, the environmental and social implications of deep-sea mining are still poorly understood, and many experts warn that it could have devastating consequences for marine ecosystems. The involvement of external actors in decision-making processes around deep-sea mining in the Pacific territory is a stark reminder of the legacy of colonialism and the ongoing struggles for self-determination and resource sovereignty. As the industry continues to develop, it's essential to prioritize transparency, accountability, and the rights of local communities.

What's next to watch is how the US government responds to growing concerns about deep-sea mining, particularly in light of the Biden administration's commitment to environmental justice and sustainability. Will there be efforts to reform the regulatory framework governing deep-sea mining, or will the industry be allowed to develop with minimal oversight? The stakes are high, and the outcome will have significant implications for the future of our oceans and the communities that depend on them.

Originally reported by grist.org. CleanNews adds analysis for climate & energy readers.